Registered OHBM participant? Please rate this abstract here

Martin Tik1, Matic Princic1, Michael Woletz1, Anna-Lisa Schuler1, Christian Windischberger1

1Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Introduction:

Transcranial magnetic stimulation is one of the most promising tools for treatment of depression. A consistent predictor for treatment efficacy is reflected in the anti-correlation between the subgenual ACC and the DLPFC before stimulation and an increase in connectivity afterwards as indicator for treatment response (Fox et al., 2012; Williams et al., 2018). We have shown in a large sample approach that offline TMS leads to a connectivity increase in ACC (Tik et al., 2017) to a specific resting-state component (RSN#17; Biswal et al., 2010).
To demonstrate the missing target-engagement during TMS we aimed to investigate (1) direct sgACC activation changes during stimulation and (2) TMS RS effects in RSN#17 on a single-subject level.
We employed an online 10Hz TMS/fMRI paradigm and resting-state fMRI immediately before and after, in order to predict treatment response in terms of connectivity changes on a single subject level.

Methods:

To investigate acute TMS/fMRI-effects, 14 right-handed subjects (6 male, age: 28 ± 3.9 years) were included in the experiment. The study was performed on a 3T Prisma scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) using a TMS/fMRI setup comprising the MagProX100 stimulator with an MRi-B91 MR-compatible TMS coil (Magventure, Farum, Denmark). Functional images during stimulation were acquired using the CMRR EPI sequence with a TR/TE=1000/38ms, 36 slices, 3 x 3 x 3mm3, 20% slice gap, MB-factor=4, delay in TR=305ms. The TMS/fMRI coil-array was positioned over the left DLPFC using an MR-compatible neuronavigation system. The stimulation target was at Brodmann area 46 (MNI-coordinate: -42, 28, 21). Concurrent TMS/fMRI was performed with a dedicated TMS/fMRI coil-array including one 7-channel surface RF coil with a TMS coil mounted on top. A second 7-channel RF-coil was placed on the contralateral side of the head in order to guarantee whole-brain coverage. TMS/fMRI consisted of triplets repeated five times for each of the four intensities adding up to a total of 60 pulses.
Six minutes of resting-state fMRI were acquired once directly before and once directly after concurrent TMS/fMRI (TR/TE=500/38ms, 24 slices, 3 x 3 x 3mm³, 25% slice gap, MB-factor=4).
Optical neuronavigation was performed throughout the whole measurement utilizing MR-compatible in-house built 3D-printed fiducial markers. This guaranteed optimal coil positioning surveillance throughout the whole setup. We performed seed-voxel analysis based on the RSN#17 by Biswal et al. (2010) for the resting-state measures (Fisher’s r-to-z transformed Pearson correlation coefficient) directly before and after concurrent TMS/fMRI.. Stimulation data analyses was performed using SPM12 with 4 task regressors representing stimulation intensities.

Results:

Single-subject connectivity between sgACC and the RSN#17 was anti-correlated (z=–0.3; Figure 2, bottom left). After concurrent TMS/fMRI connectivity of the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex to the IC#17 increased to become positively coupled (z=+0.37). The comparison between z-values pre and post stimulation revealed a specific connectivity change in the subgenual ACC.
The same effect was formerly shown after 1200 pulses of 10 Hz rTMS (Figure 2, bottom right). Regarding acute TMS induced BOLD-responses, concurrent TMS/fMRI led to activity increases in core brain areas of the RSN#17 (T-contrast over all intensities) and increased activity in the subgenual ACC for high intensity stimulation (110>80%).

Conclusions:

Here we show that altered connectivity after TMS over left DLPFC is preceded by acute co-activation in a specific network (RSN#17). This leads lasting connectivity increase of sgACC to RSN#17 in subsequent RS on a group- as well as on a single-subject level. Notably, a very small number of TMS-pulses (60) led to changes detectable on a single subject level. This setup has the potential to be used to predict treatment success before rTMS therapy plans and adjust important TMS parameters to improve response-rates.

11 thoughts on “Concurrent TMS/fMRI demonstrates direct sgACC target engagement

  1. free-xxx-tubes.co

    Magnificent goods from you, man. I have understand
    your stuff previous to and you are just extremely wonderful.
    I actually like what you’ve acquired here, certainly like what you are stating and the way in which
    you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still take care of to keep it smart.
    I can’t wait to read far more from you. This is actually a tremendous website.

    Have a look at my blog post – free xxx tube (free-xxx-tubes.co)

  2. Roy

    Hey There. I discovered your weblog the usage of msn. This is an extremely
    smartly written article. I’ll be sure to bookmark it
    and come back to read more of your helpful information. Thank you for the post.

    I’ll definitely return.

  3. ginocchio protesizzato dolore gonfiore artrolux+

    My spouse and I absolutely love your blog and find nearly
    all of your post’s to be exactly what I’m looking for.
    Do you offer guest writers to write content available for you?

    I wouldn’t mind publishing a post or elaborating on a few of the subjects you write in relation to here.
    Again, awesome site!

  4. Rachelle

    Awesome things here. I am very glad to see your post.

    Thank you so much and I’m having a look forward to touch you.

    Will you please drop me a mail?

  5. Kindra

    Hi there, I discovered your website by the use of Google even as searching
    for a similar subject, your web site got here up, it looks good.
    I’ve bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
    Hi there, just was aware of your blog via Google,
    and found that it’s truly informative. I’m gonna be careful for brussels.
    I will appreciate for those who continue this
    in future. Numerous other folks will be benefited from your writing.
    Cheers!

  6. Roger

    Hello, i read your blog from time to time and i own a similar
    one and i was just curious if you get a lot of spam feedback?
    If so how do you stop it, any plugin or anything you can recommend?

    I get so much lately it’s driving me crazy so any help is very much appreciated.

  7. Marie

    Hi to all, it’s genuinely a fastidious for me to pay a visit this web site, it contains
    useful Information.

  8. Cheryl

    Generally I do not read post on blogs, but I would like
    to say that this write-up very forced me to try and do it!
    Your writing style has been amazed me. Thank you, quite nice post.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.